“Hereby were rich and poor in the first place brought into the right position towards each other.
The rich gave what he gave to God, and the poor receive what he received from God. Thus the temptation of the rich to exalt themselves above the poor, and the humiliation of the poor at being obliged to receive assistance from others, were removed, while at the same time, discontent and murmuring, as well as insolent demands and presumptuous requests, were done away with.
The rich became conscious that he only gave back to God what he had first received. The poor became conscious, that the same God, who had imparted to himself a smaller measure of earthly goods, yet took care that he should not suffer want. It was no longer a disgrace to be poor and to receive assistance from the Church.
The poor, like the officers of the Church, loved off the alter; nay, to apply to the poor in general a much used expression in the Epistle of Polycarp [to the Philippians], with respect to to widows, they were themselves, “the altar of the Church” on which it deposits its offerings.
Such gifts had not the effect, so often occurring in other instances, of separating between rich and poor by increasing and rendering still more prominent the chasm existing between them, but were a bond which united them in God, by making them conscious of their oneness in the one Lord.”
The explanation of first-century expression “the altar of the Church” of Polycarp of Smyrna (69-155) in Letter to the Philippians 4 as explained by Gerhard Uhlhorn in Christian Charity in the Ancient Church (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1883) 146-147.
Read more