I told them, “If you think it best, give me my pay; but if not, keep it.” So they paid me thirty pieces of silver. And the LORD said to me, “Throw it to the potter”—the handsome price at which they valued me! So I took the thirty pieces of silver and threw them to the potter at the house of the LORD. Zechariah 11:12-13 (cf. Matthew 26:15; 27:3)
“Israel always tried to buy off Yahweh with thirty pieces of silver. It gave him a modicum of Yahweh-religion which it made as similar as possible to the religion of all other peoples. It gave Him a minimum of sacrificial and legal observance—just enough to maintain the cult formally throughout the centuries, much as the thirty pieces of silver were eventually good enough to be put in the treasury whose contents were earmarked for the current upkeep of the temple.
Israel was never prepared to give Him the full offering of thanksgiving for His faithfulness as the Shepherd, and it therefore refused to give Him the one thing which it owed. The paltry and wholly inadequate payment which Israel dared to offer God for His faithfulness as the Shepherd, the thirty pieces of silver, are themselves returned to Judas and therefore to the people of Israel as a payment for his faithlessness…
This, then, must be his reward. In the person of Judas there is so to speak, handed back—and from the hand of his own leaders—that which he had dared to offer to God in place of what he owed Him. The rejection of Israel by its Good Shepherd, to which that passage in Zechariah refers, is now inexorably executed, but in a way which is certainly not foreseen in that passage, for it is not the flock sold by the sheep-dealers that is led to slaughter, but the Good Shepherd Himself.”
Karl Barth (1886-1968) in Church Dogmatics: The Doctrine of God (New York: T&T Clark, 2010) 271.
Read more